C0ALS TO NEWCASTLE?
J. Saxon
For several years I had contemplated building
a patio in my back garden but the size of the job was somewhat off-putting since
it involved removing a wall retaining the soil and making a considerable
excavation to bring the level down to an existing path. The retaining wall would
have to be rebuilt at a position much further back. I estimated that it would
involve the removal of several cubic metres of overburden, which is quite a
daunting amount since it had to be done by hand there being no access to bring
in a mechanical digger. The wall was removed and digging commenced. At the back
of the excavation I struck bedrock at about 72Omm below the surface and the
remainder of the overburden had to be removed to reveal the surface of the rock.
The dip was 10� in a direction 10�
North of west, similar to the dip on the foreshore between Thurso and Scrabster
and at Thurso East shore.
It was clearly necessary, if we were to level
the site off, to quarry out the bedrock by hand. The top 200mm consisted of dark
incaceous shales which were poorly fissile and had to be broken up using a
sledge hammer. Below the shales was a bed of grey limestone with a ripple-marked
surface. When struck with a hammer it gave off a sulphurous smell, a phenomenon
commonly associated with fossiliferous rocks. On removing the limestone layer it
proved to be charged with organic remains in the form of scales, bones and
plates of two groups of fishes: the osteolepids and the dipnoi, together with
coprolites. Early in the excavation work I came on the frontal part of the skull
of Gyroptychius milleri, clearly a small specimen. About 160mm below the top of
the limestone band I came upon a complete specimen of Dipterus valenciennesi
41Omm in length. The state of preservation of the specimen was reminiscent of
those from Weydale quarry. This quarry was unfortunately destroyed as a
collecting site by indiscriminate dumping by the late Thurso Town Council in
spite of a plea from the Nature Conservancy Council to preserve a small part of
it for scheduling as a Site of Special Scientific Importance.
The small exposure in my back garden has a
significance out of all proportion to its size. The nearest rocks exposed on the
sea shore are the Mey Beds containing mainly Thursius pholidotus and
Millerosteus minor. This exposure is bounded on the east side by a fault which
occurs roughly where the steps lead down from Victoria Walk to the promenade and
on the west by the fault which produces the scarp overlooking Scrabster Harbour.
To the east we have the Spittal Beds of the Kirk Ebb and Thurso East shore and
to the west we have the Spittal Beds of Holborn Head. Since the Mey Beds are
younger than the Spittal Beds this means that Thurso's Mey Beds must be faulted
down.
It was already known that the Scrabster Burn
cuts through Spittal Beds of Holborn Head type on the Hill of Forss and that
there was therefore a further fault inland, running between the Thurso Fault and
the Scrabster Fault but its exact position was not known. Now the small exposure
in my garden is of Spittal Beds of the Thurso East type and the field in front
of my house displays the gentle undulations which suggests that the cyclothems
of this system extend down the hill towards the A836 road. The significance of
this is that the fragment of Mey Beds faulted down may be very narrow indeed.
There is a very prominent boulder clay escarpment known as the Braes of
Scrabster between Scrabster Burn at Burnside and the oil storage tanks at
Scrabster. This may well prove to be the fault scarp against which the Mey Beds
are thrown down, confining the exposure to little more than a coastal strip.
|